Welcome to our website
To take full advantage of all features you need to login or register. Registration is completely free and takes only a few seconds.
3DMark 2003: Hey, What is Everyone Complaining About?
Posted by philipp on: 02/13/2003 06:35 PM [ Print | 0 comment(s) ]
Explosive Labs has completed an article on 3DMark 2003.
I think everything has its time and place, even synthetic benchmarks. The only thing they bring more than the real-world (in some cases not all) is consistency. For real-world test, more often than not there is a degree of human error. Most reviewers are stuck with programs like FRAPs, [a VERY handy tool] which leave it to the user to specify intervals to benchmark. The bad thing is, with DX9, AA scores are all screwed up even when running DX8 games. This is another reason why reviewers are hesitant to travel to the next generation of technology. It is screwed up!
Read more
Related Threads
10/09/2003 05:54 AM: 3dmark 2003 error (3) by gmenik
02/06/2005 10:41 PM: 3DMark 2001SE build 330 seems too low. please comment (6) by muzie
07/10/2001 04:47 AM: 3DMark 2000 Scores in WinXP Pro RC1 (5) by FOB2k
07/05/2001 10:07 PM: Weird problems with 3dmark 2000 and 2001 on AMD TBIRD 1.3 gi (1) by Brian Frank
02/07/2001 09:42 AM: 3DMARK 2000 1.1 ERROR!!!!!!!!! (3) by T0NT0
11/15/2000 07:18 PM: 3DMark 2000 (2) by Gerbache Kaznet
07/03/2000 11:15 PM: 3DMark 2000 and WinNT (1) by DosFreak
02/06/2005 10:41 PM: 3DMark 2001SE build 330 seems too low. please comment (6) by muzie
07/10/2001 04:47 AM: 3DMark 2000 Scores in WinXP Pro RC1 (5) by FOB2k
07/05/2001 10:07 PM: Weird problems with 3dmark 2000 and 2001 on AMD TBIRD 1.3 gi (1) by Brian Frank
02/07/2001 09:42 AM: 3DMARK 2000 1.1 ERROR!!!!!!!!! (3) by T0NT0
11/15/2000 07:18 PM: 3DMark 2000 (2) by Gerbache Kaznet
07/03/2000 11:15 PM: 3DMark 2000 and WinNT (1) by DosFreak

