NT Compatible
  • News
    • Channels
    • Archive
    • Search
    • Submit
  • Articles
    • Categories
  • Knowledgebase
  • Compatibility
    • Search
  • Links
  • Forums
  • Twitter
Advertisement

Latest News
[ Windows | Linux | Apple ]

· Install Cinnamon 1.4 on Fedora 17
· Daily Reviews Summary 05/30/12
· Absinthe jailbreaks nearly 1 million iOS devices over holiday weekend
· CompatDB Updates 05/30/12
· Apple CEO Tim Cook slams Windows 8 again
· Update Rollup 3 for Exchange Server 2010 Service Pack 2 (KB2685289)
· Microsoft outsources copyright enforcement to small Redmond company
· Microsoft to officially distribute products in Iraq
· Microsoft finally goes public with Windows Azure Active Directory details
· DSA 2480-2: request-tracker3.8 regression update

Upcoming News
· CM Storm Sentinel Advance II High Performance Laser Gaming Mouse Review
· Luvinia Celebrates Yutaka's Tomb Expansion & Level Cap Raise with E3 Fight Nights
· OCZ Vertex 4 256GB SSD Review @ Neoseeker
· Intel Core i5-3470 Quad-Core CPU Review @ HotHardware.com
· News: Intel's ultrabook-bound Core i5-3427U processor
· Intel Core i5-3427U: Ivy Bridge For Ultrabooks @ HotHardware
· Intel Ivy Bridge Core i5-3427U / Ultrabook Platform Review: Making Slower Faster
· ASUS P8Z77-M Pro Micro-ATX Motherboard Review @ Hi Tech Legion
· REVIEW: ASUS P8Z77-V Deluxe and Pro @ PureOverclock
· NewerTech NuGreen Energy Efficient Flexible Neck LED Desk Lamp Review

Windows Compatibility
· Realtek High Definition Audio for 2K/XP/03
· Win7codecs x64
· Google Chrome 18.0.1025.168 Final
· IObit Malware Fighter
· Silver
· Advanced SystemCare with Antivirus 2012
· K-Lite Codec Pack Update
· Microsoft Mathematics
· AVZ Antiviral Toolkit
· Intel Turbo Boost Technology Monitor

New Forum Topics
· USB Not detected on any PC
by: AntNik45
on: 2012-05-09 18:37
0 replies, 0 views

· RESIDENT EVIL 2 for PC
by: elyp00
on: 2012-05-04 07:55
0 replies, 0 views

· Need to know if those graphic cards works well on Ubuntu
by: Dechiqtor
on: 2012-04-19 23:04
0 replies, 0 views

· Obtaining IE8
by: packman
on: 2012-04-14 19:46
0 replies, 0 views

· A few problems running Warcraft II Battle.net Edition on Vista
by: Lord Claremorris
on: 2012-04-08 16:15
0 replies, 0 views

News Channels
· Drivers
· Guides
· Reviews
· Security
· Software
· Press Release
· Windows XP
· Microsoft
· Updates
· Interviews
· Windows Server 2003
· General
· Windows Vista
· Webcasts
· Windows Server 2008
· Windows Home Server
· Windows 7
· Windows 8
· Windows Phone 7

What's New
Login to see an overview of all news stories since your last visit.

Affiliates

Welcome to our website

To take full advantage of all features you need to login or register. Registration is completely free and takes only a few seconds.

NT Compatible » News » December 2008 » Windows Vista SP2 beta performance

Windows Vista SP2 beta performance

Posted by Philipp Esselbach on: 12/10/2008 02:37 PM [ Print | 0 comment(s) ]

bit-tech published a look at Windows Vista SP2 beta performance




The best performance increase was in our //Crysis benchmark with a pair of Radeon HD 4870 1GB cards running in CrossFire - Microsoft did promise some graphics performance improvements, but they weren't as unanimous as we were expecting them to be. This was really the only
scenario out of the six that were tested where we saw any kind of performance increase.

Despite mentioning the GIMP image editing test as the application that suffered the most from the new Service Pack beta, it was the OS boot time and //Crysis level load times that concerned us the most. We would have hoped the new Service Pack would improve boot times further and not increase them by between three and five percent.

The promise of increased power efficiency by up to 10 percent is one that will certainly pique the interests of notebook users for sure, while support for Windows Search 4.0 and Bluetooth 2.1 will be beneficial as well. However, these things aren't enough for us to recommend upgrading to the Service Pack 2 beta today on any systems that are mission critical - Microsoft is keen to point out that the Service Pack 2 beta is very much for evaluation purposes only.

With that in mind, a lot of what we've looked at here could change drastically between now and when Windows Vista Service Pack 2 is final and, like Microsoft, we recommend sticking with a fully patched Windows Vista Service Pack 1 installation for the time being. So, unless you are planning to test out some of Vista Service Pack 2's new features, continue on with your SP1 install at least until SP2 reaches Release Candidate or RTM status.

Windows Vista SP2 beta performance


Bookmark and Share

Related Threads

03/13/2012 05:57 PM: Anyone know the intracacies of Windows Update? (0) by packman
10/19/2011 08:55 PM: realtek windows 7 recording issue (0) by steven5638
09/24/2011 08:24 PM: Sim City 3000 w/ Windows 7 (0) by ALR350Z
05/14/2011 07:40 PM: Windows NT Memory Monitoring Software? (1) by Wilhelmus
04/30/2011 10:37 PM: Tie fighter 95 with windows xp (0) by Cheesecake
12/28/2010 12:42 AM: Speed up viewing shared files across a network in windows XP/2000 (1) by TheFly42
08/16/2010 08:29 AM: Help!! Windows 7 Problem!? Please. (4) by suraner
02/17/2011 12:31 PM: Windows 98-SE + Radeon 9550SE (1) by henrykipson
07/16/2010 11:12 AM: Microsoft Windows Network - invalid (deleted ) domain (0) by LuRs52
04/26/2010 12:21 PM: Windows 2000 Server (1) by DosFreak

« Fusion-io ioDrive - PCIe Solid State Review · Verbatim Recharge & Go Wireless Mouse Review »

NT Compatible » News » December 2008 » Windows Vista SP2 beta performance
All products mentioned are registered trademarks or trademarks of their respective owners.
© 1998-2011 Esselbach Internet Solutions - All Rights Reserved. Terms and privacy policy
Powered by Contentteller® Business Edition