NT Compatible
  • News
    • Channels
    • Archive
    • Search
    • Submit
  • Articles
    • Categories
  • Knowledgebase
  • Compatibility
    • Search
  • Links
  • Forums
  • Twitter
Advertisement

Latest News
[ Windows | Linux | Apple ]

· Daily Reviews Summary 05/25/12
· CompatDB Updates 05/25/12
· Rumor: Microsoft Office coming to iPad, Android in November
· Microsoft clarifies Ballmer's claims of massive Windows 8 adoption
· DSA 2480-1: request-tracker3.8 security update
· CentOS 6 NTP Server
· Daily Reviews Summary 05/24/12
· Bayan Audio - Bayan 7 iPod Speaker Dock Review
· Installing Nginx With PHP5 (And PHP-FPM) And MySQL Support (LEMP) On Ubuntu 12.04 LTS
· Ubuntu 12.04 + Nvidia - Heavy CPU usage

Upcoming News
· Thermaltake ToughPower Grand 850W Power Supply Review @ Rbmods
· Cooler Master Silent Pro Gold 1200-watt Power Supply Review
· Wine release 1.5.5
· OC3D: BitFenix Prodigy Review
· [Tech ARP] The New x264 HD Benchmark 5.0 Is Here!
· re: Diablo III Reviewed: Blizzard's Brilliant, Blundering Wreck
· Corsair Vengeance C70 Case Review @ Hardware Secrets
· Diablo III Reviewed: Blizzard's Brilliant, Blundering Wreck
· Samsung Green DDR3 8GB 1600mhz 30nm Memory review
· Withings Wi-Fi Body Scale Review @ TestFreaks

Windows Compatibility
· Advanced SystemCare with Antivirus 2012
· Realtek High Definition Audio for 2K/XP/03
· NVIDIA BIOS Editor (NiBiTor)
· Norton Internet Security 2013 20.0.0.106 Beta
· IObit SmartDefrag v2 Beta 2.0
· Google Chrome 18.0.1025.168 Final
· K-Lite Codec Pack Update
· WinSock XP Fix 1.2
· Windows 8 Codecs
· Google Chrome 21.0.1145.0 Dev

New Forum Topics
· USB Not detected on any PC
by: AntNik45
on: 2012-05-09 18:37
0 replies, 0 views

· RESIDENT EVIL 2 for PC
by: elyp00
on: 2012-05-04 07:55
0 replies, 0 views

· Need to know if those graphic cards works well on Ubuntu
by: Dechiqtor
on: 2012-04-19 23:04
0 replies, 0 views

· Obtaining IE8
by: packman
on: 2012-04-14 19:46
0 replies, 0 views

· A few problems running Warcraft II Battle.net Edition on Vista
by: Lord Claremorris
on: 2012-04-08 16:15
0 replies, 0 views

News Channels
· Drivers
· Guides
· Reviews
· Security
· Software
· Press Release
· Windows XP
· Microsoft
· Updates
· Interviews
· Windows Server 2003
· General
· Windows Vista
· Webcasts
· Windows Server 2008
· Windows Home Server
· Windows 7
· Windows 8
· Windows Phone 7

What's New
Login to see an overview of all news stories since your last visit.

Affiliates

Welcome to our website

To take full advantage of all features you need to login or register. Registration is completely free and takes only a few seconds.

NT Compatible » News » September 2009 » Windows 7 Review Part 6: Performance

Windows 7 Review Part 6: Performance

Posted by Philipp Esselbach on: 09/08/2009 05:14 PM [ Print | 0 comment(s) ]

Paul Thurrott posted part 6 of his Windows 7 review




When Microsoft unleashed Windows Vista on a surprisingly unsuspecting world three years ago, the software giant delivered on its promise of a major, revolutionary Windows release. But the downsides to such sweeping changes are many, and in the case of Windows Vista, these downsides outweighed the benefits, thanks to narrow-minded and forgetful tech reviewers, screechy Apple advertising, and other factors. And none of those downsides weighed more heavily on users, perhaps, than performance. When it first shipped, Windows Vista simply ran more slowly than its predecessor on the same hardware. You know, just like virtually every other Windows version ever shipped.

The funny thing about Vista performance, however, is that while it improved over time, few people even noticed since Vista-bashing had become a national pastime. Microsoft dramatically overhauled Vista performance, a process that culminated with the release of Vista Service Pack 1 (SP1) in early 2008. Disk file copy issues? Fixed. Startup, standby, resume, and shutdown speeds were all dramatically increased. Drivers were made more efficient, improving battery life. According to industry benchmarks, by the time SP1 shipped, real world Vista performance was on par with, in some cases superior to, that of XP.

Windows 7 Review Part 6: Performance


Bookmark and Share

Related Threads

03/13/2012 05:57 PM: Anyone know the intracacies of Windows Update? (0) by packman
10/19/2011 08:55 PM: realtek windows 7 recording issue (0) by steven5638
09/24/2011 08:24 PM: Sim City 3000 w/ Windows 7 (0) by ALR350Z
05/14/2011 07:40 PM: Windows NT Memory Monitoring Software? (1) by Wilhelmus
04/30/2011 10:37 PM: Tie fighter 95 with windows xp (0) by Cheesecake
12/28/2010 12:42 AM: Speed up viewing shared files across a network in windows XP/2000 (1) by TheFly42
08/16/2010 08:29 AM: Help!! Windows 7 Problem!? Please. (4) by suraner
02/17/2011 12:31 PM: Windows 98-SE + Radeon 9550SE (1) by henrykipson
07/16/2010 11:12 AM: Microsoft Windows Network - invalid (deleted ) domain (0) by LuRs52
04/26/2010 12:21 PM: Windows 2000 Server (1) by DosFreak

« RHSA-2009:1427-01 Moderate: fetchmail security update · Apple predicted to sell 7M iPhones as 3GS availability improves »

NT Compatible » News » September 2009 » Windows 7 Review Part 6: Performance
All products mentioned are registered trademarks or trademarks of their respective owners.
© 1998-2011 Esselbach Internet Solutions - All Rights Reserved. Terms and privacy policy
Powered by Contentteller® Business Edition