NT Compatible
  • News
    • Channels
    • Archive
    • Search
    • Submit
  • Articles
    • Categories
  • Knowledgebase
  • Compatibility
    • Search
  • Links
  • Forums
  • Twitter
Advertisement

Latest News
[ Windows | Linux | Apple ]

· Fedora 17 released
· Chinese Windows 8 Release Preview (build 8400) leaked
· Daily Reviews Summary 05/29/12
· Microsoft Xbox 720 to feature in-game Skype integration
· Installing Lighttpd With PHP5 (PHP-FPM) And MySQL Support On Ubuntu 12.04
· CompatDB Updates 05/28/12
· Daily Reviews Summary 05/28/12
· GLSA 201205-04: Chromium, V8: Multiple vulnerabilities
· Daily Reviews Summary 05/26/12
· Microsoft Office for iPad reportedly on track for November release

Upcoming News
· HIS HD7850 & HD 7870 GHz Edition Graphics Cards reviewed in Metku.net
· Microsoft's New User Agreement Bans Class Action Lawsuits @ NGOHQ.com
· NVIDIA claims GTX 680 sales outpace GTX 580
· Intel i7-3770K Ivy Bridge CPU reviewed in Metku.net
· [RHSA-2012:0699-01] Moderate: openssl security and bug fix update
· [RHSA-2012:0690-01] Important: kernel security and bug fix update
· Super Flower Golden Silent 500w Review - XSReviews
· eTeknix Insider Edition #15 @ eTeknix.com
· Ubuntu Weekly Newsletter Issue 267
· Cygnett GrooveTrip II Mini FM Transmitter Review @ TestFreaks

Windows Compatibility
· IObit Malware Fighter
· IObit SmartDefrag
· Realtek High Definition Audio for 2K/XP/03
· Advanced SystemCare with Antivirus 2012
· Samsung Drive Diagnostic Utility (Hutil)
· Google Chrome 18.0.1025.168 Final
· Skype
· Advanced SystemCare Free 5.3.0.245 Final
· IObit SmartDefrag v2 Beta 3.0
· Atheros Wireless AR5B91 Driver

New Forum Topics
· USB Not detected on any PC
by: AntNik45
on: 2012-05-09 18:37
0 replies, 0 views

· RESIDENT EVIL 2 for PC
by: elyp00
on: 2012-05-04 07:55
0 replies, 0 views

· Need to know if those graphic cards works well on Ubuntu
by: Dechiqtor
on: 2012-04-19 23:04
0 replies, 0 views

· Obtaining IE8
by: packman
on: 2012-04-14 19:46
0 replies, 0 views

· A few problems running Warcraft II Battle.net Edition on Vista
by: Lord Claremorris
on: 2012-04-08 16:15
0 replies, 0 views

News Channels
· Drivers
· Guides
· Reviews
· Security
· Software
· Press Release
· Windows XP
· Microsoft
· Updates
· Interviews
· Windows Server 2003
· General
· Windows Vista
· Webcasts
· Windows Server 2008
· Windows Home Server
· Windows 7
· Windows 8
· Windows Phone 7

What's New
Login to see an overview of all news stories since your last visit.

Affiliates

Welcome to our website

To take full advantage of all features you need to login or register. Registration is completely free and takes only a few seconds.

NT Compatible » News » September 2008 » XFX's GeForce 9600 GSO 680M XXX Edition Review

XFX's GeForce 9600 GSO 680M XXX Edition Review

Posted by Philipp Esselbach on: 09/22/2008 11:23 AM [ Print | 0 comment(s) ]

bit-tech published a review of XFX's GeForce 9600 GSO 680M XXX Edition




When we first had a look at XFX's GeForce 9600 GSO XXX Edition during our initial look at AMD's new ATI Radeon HD 4670, we said that the card was too expensive to really be a competitor with the AMD's new card. However, since then the pricing has dropped by around £10, which makes it only £5 dearer than most Radeon HD 4670 cards on the market today.

With just £5 between the two cards, the purchasing choice is almost a no brainer, unless you are strictly limited to spending £60 and no more. XFX's card offers quite a bit more performance in the games tested here and seems fairly well-suited to current games on the market at 1,280 x 1,024 in particular. At a stretch, playing games at 1,680 x 1,050 is possible, but you'll need to make some sacrifices in games like Crysis especially.

Unfortunately though, we were able to find one (yes, one) Radeon HD 4670 for just under £55 -- Force3D's Radeon HD 4670 is available on Ebuyer for £54.99 (inc. VAT). This makes things difficult for us because £10 is quite a large difference in price in the mainstream market -- XFX's 9600 GSO 680M XXX Edition costs 18 percent more.

Of course, we could talk about how great the Radeon HD 4850 is here, and why you should look to stretch to one of those if at all possible, but you're going to have to spend twice as much as these cards to get one. That takes it out of the equation completely, as far as we're concerned -- they're gunning for completely different markets.

If Force3D's Radeon HD 4670 stock dries up and no other AMD partner offers the 4670 at under £55, then the decision is a no brainer -- spend the extra £5 or so and get the XFX card because it's well worth it in that situation. However, if more AMD partners drop their 4670 pricing to under £55, both cards look like decent choices -- it'll depend on how much you've got to spend at the end of the day. We'd recommend stretching your budget as far as possible if you can, because the additional performance delivered by XFX's GeForce 9600 GSO 680M XXX Edition is arguably worth an extra tenner.

XFX's GeForce 9600 GSO 680M XXX Edition Review


Bookmark and Share

« QNAP's TS-409 Pro Turbo NAS Review · Gigabyte GC230D Atom Mini-ITX motherboard Review »

NT Compatible » News » September 2008 » XFX's GeForce 9600 GSO 680M XXX Edition Review
All products mentioned are registered trademarks or trademarks of their respective owners.
© 1998-2011 Esselbach Internet Solutions - All Rights Reserved. Terms and privacy policy
Powered by Contentteller® Business Edition