+win2k +defragmenting +fat32 +rc3
This is a discussion about +win2k +defragmenting +fat32 +rc3 in the Windows Hardware category; I read somewhere that the problem with defragmenting in win2k for fat32 hd's is fixed in the RC3 release. Can someone confirm this? I got 250000 lost clusters last time I defragged my hd in win2k so I'm a little scared off.
I read somewhere that the problem with defragmenting in win2k for fat32 hd's is fixed in the RC3 release. Can someone confirm this?
I got 250000 lost clusters last time I defragged my hd in win2k so I'm a little scared off...
I got 250000 lost clusters last time I defragged my hd in win2k so I'm a little scared off...
Participate in our website and join the conversation
This subject has been archived. New comments and votes cannot be submitted.
Dec 6
Dec 6
0
1 minute
Responses to this topic
I do it all the time, have no probs at all
You should real use NTFS it is far better then 32bit fat
OP
Impressive latency.
SHS, I dualboot along with win98 so I only have one ntfs HD; the one win2k is installed on. The others are fat32.
Ekstreme, the developers had a hard time defining the problem since it was really hard to reproduce, they could defrag a HD houndred times and everything would be fine. Just to get troubles the 101th time...
SHS, I dualboot along with win98 so I only have one ntfs HD; the one win2k is installed on. The others are fat32.
Ekstreme, the developers had a hard time defining the problem since it was really hard to reproduce, they could defrag a HD houndred times and everything would be fine. Just to get troubles the 101th time...
Hmmm, doesn't that just sound sooo typical???
Such is life
Such is life
