3dmarks in WIN 2000 are low
This is a discussion about 3dmarks in WIN 2000 are low in the Windows Software category; I scored a 5100 with my system in WIN98, so I decided to load 3dmarks2000 and give it a shot while I have WIN2000 loaded. 2848 is what I scored. I went from a 5100 in WIN 98 to a 2848 in WIN2000. Of course every driver on my WIN 2000 is practically beta still.
I scored a 5100 with my system in WIN98, so I decided to load 3dmarks2000 and give it a shot while I have WIN2000 loaded.
2848 is what I scored. I went from a 5100 in WIN 98 to a 2848 in WIN2000.
Of course every driver on my WIN 2000 is practically beta still. To include my ATA 66 drivers. But, I was not expecting such a low score.
Also, the drivers I used are the NVIDIA 3.66 ones as they seem the most stable in WIN2000 at the moment.
Every game still plays smooth and silky though and I guess that is the most important thing.
Maybe the 3dmarks 2000 is not optimized for WIN2000 too?
------------------
PIII650 @ 728
Abit BE6-2
256MB PC 100
3D Prophet SDR 32MB
2848 is what I scored. I went from a 5100 in WIN 98 to a 2848 in WIN2000.
Of course every driver on my WIN 2000 is practically beta still. To include my ATA 66 drivers. But, I was not expecting such a low score.
Also, the drivers I used are the NVIDIA 3.66 ones as they seem the most stable in WIN2000 at the moment.
Every game still plays smooth and silky though and I guess that is the most important thing.
Maybe the 3dmarks 2000 is not optimized for WIN2000 too?
------------------
PIII650 @ 728
Abit BE6-2
256MB PC 100
3D Prophet SDR 32MB
Participate in our website and join the conversation
This subject has been archived. New comments and votes cannot be submitted.
Mar 15
Mar 17
0
1 minute
Responses to this topic
No, its the 3.66 NVIDIA driver.
