Disk slower on WIN2000 ??
This is a discussion about Disk slower on WIN2000 ?? in the Windows Hardware category; Hi there, here's my problem : I've got a BP6 Mobo working just fine, but (!!) I have noticed that my harddrive is slower on Win2K than on Win98 for example when I load a huge MP3 playlist. This is on a IBM 20Go 7200T Hard Drive, located on the first HPT366 chanel of the mobo and on a FAT 32 partition.
Hi there, here's my problem :
I've got a BP6 Mobo working just fine, but (!!) I have noticed that my harddrive is slower on Win2K than on Win98 for example when I load a huge MP3 playlist. This is on a IBM 20Go 7200T Hard Drive, located on the first HPT366 chanel of the mobo and on a FAT 32 partition.
I have the latest version of the HPT366 driver for Win2K. If anyone has a clue why the disk is slower.. Thanks
I've got a BP6 Mobo working just fine, but (!!) I have noticed that my harddrive is slower on Win2K than on Win98 for example when I load a huge MP3 playlist. This is on a IBM 20Go 7200T Hard Drive, located on the first HPT366 chanel of the mobo and on a FAT 32 partition.
I have the latest version of the HPT366 driver for Win2K. If anyone has a clue why the disk is slower.. Thanks
Participate in our website and join the conversation
This subject has been archived. New comments and votes cannot be submitted.
Nov 10
Nov 14
0
2 minutes
Responses to this topic
Is this a "feeling"? or have you benchmarked your drive? Use HDTACH to bench.
My guess is that it is on a FAT32 partition instead of NTFS. W2k will work better using it's native file system.
yes its a fact that FAT32 is slower than NTFS5. So convert the drive to NTFS and it should be faster
In some things, Fat32 are fster, other things, NTFS faster. For eksample, moving a lot of small files from one HD to another, using FAT32 is faster. But defragmenting a 8GB FAt32 HD is very slow compared to the same NTFS 8GB HD, probably three times as fast.
But access like that, might be because of the way win2k performs Winamp's requests. For instance, Opera 4.0 hangs my computer for a while (3-5 secs) every now and then, but in winme and whistler it never does that.
I dont know this for sure though, it can either be the driver and OS too get a HD benchmarking and check what things is slower like DOSFeak said!
But access like that, might be because of the way win2k performs Winamp's requests. For instance, Opera 4.0 hangs my computer for a while (3-5 secs) every now and then, but in winme and whistler it never does that.
I dont know this for sure though, it can either be the driver and OS too get a HD benchmarking and check what things is slower like DOSFeak said!
OP
OK,
first thanks all for your replies. This in fact was due to the FAT32 file system as I tried transfering files to an NTFS partition and it proves to be much faster. The problem is I access those files from W98 or W2k so they must stay on the FAT32 partition.
I'll just be patient and this will do, unless someone has a magic patch to have W98 recognise NTFS ??!!
Thanks again all.
first thanks all for your replies. This in fact was due to the FAT32 file system as I tried transfering files to an NTFS partition and it proves to be much faster. The problem is I access those files from W98 or W2k so they must stay on the FAT32 partition.
I'll just be patient and this will do, unless someone has a magic patch to have W98 recognise NTFS ??!!
Thanks again all.
There is a [non-free, which means there is probably a free version] program that will allow DOS to recognize NTFS. I'm looking for it, but haven't found it yet [too many bookmarks]. I'll get back here when I do find it.
-bZj
-bZj
