FPS in Quake on new CPU

This is a discussion about FPS in Quake on new CPU in the Windows Hardware category; I just bought an Athlon 800 and Abit KA7 MB. But when I run Q3 in 640x480, fastest setting with all game options turned off, I only get 63 FPS. Is this good, or sound to low? BTW, I have a Creative Blaster TNT 16MB video card and 196MB of RAM.

Windows Hardware 9627 This topic was started by , . Last reply by ,


data/avatar/default/avatar26.webp

362 Posts
Location -
Joined 2000-03-16
I just bought an Athlon 800 and Abit KA7 MB.
 
But when I run Q3 in 640x480, fastest setting with all game options turned off, I only get 63 FPS. Is this good, or sound to low?
 
BTW, I have a Creative Blaster TNT 16MB video card and 196MB of RAM.
 
TIA

Participate in our website and join the conversation

You already have an account on our website? To log in, use the link provided below.
Login
Create a new user account. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds.
Register
This subject has been archived. New comments and votes cannot be submitted.
Jun 17
Created
Jun 18
Last Response
0
Likes
2 minutes
Read Time
User User User
Users

Responses to this topic


data/avatar/default/avatar20.webp

193 Posts
Location -
Joined 1999-10-23
That FPS score is decent but not great. You should aim for around the 90s+ fps scores though. You should consider upgrading your video card if you want more FPS. Nvidia DDR based cards are excellent for OpenGL games.
 
------------------
Supermicro P6DBE Rev 3.0 Motherboard
Dual Intel Pentium III 850
512 MEGS of ECC RAM
Sound Blaster Live!
Adaptec 29160 SCSI Card
GeForce 2 GTS 64MB
IBM DMVS18N Ultra 160 Hard Drive
Western Digital 20.5GB Hard Drive
Razer Boom Slang 2000 (USB)
Roland Sound Canvis SC-55
3COM 3CR990-TX-97 with 3XP Processor 10/100 PCI Network Interface Card
Plextor Plexwriter 12/4/32
Pioneer DVD-ROM
Sony GDM-F500R Monitor

data/avatar/default/avatar26.webp

362 Posts
Location -
Joined 2000-03-16
OP
I would love to upgrade, but the new CPU and MB, broke my bank for a couple of months. I was just looking at sites like anandtech and sharkyextreme. And their review of the Athlon 800 with a TNT2, they were getting 88 FPS. Is the TNT2 that much better than the TNT? I thought I would at least be able to get 75 FPS.

data/avatar/default/avatar39.webp

3867 Posts
Location -
Joined 2000-02-04
The TNT2 is ALOT better than the TNT1. 640X480 is not really much of a test for a video card since your testing the cpu + vid card. Run benchmarks at 1024X768 and compare to TNT2. You will notice a HUGE difference in performance.