Matrox G400 32 meg and WindowsME, Any known problems?

This is a discussion about Matrox G400 32 meg and WindowsME, Any known problems? in the Windows Hardware category; ?

Windows Hardware 9627 This topic was started by , . Last reply by ,


data/avatar/default/avatar35.webp

1030 Posts
Location -
Joined 2000-02-19
?

Participate in our website and join the conversation

You already have an account on our website? To log in, use the link provided below.
Login
Create a new user account. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds.
Register
This subject has been archived. New comments and votes cannot be submitted.
Jul 3
Created
Jul 5
Last Response
0
Likes
1 minute
Read Time
User User User User
Users

Responses to this topic


data/avatar/default/avatar39.webp

3867 Posts
Location -
Joined 2000-02-04
Nope it's still as slow as it is in 95,98,NT4,NT5.

data/avatar/default/avatar29.webp

49 Posts
Location -
Joined 2000-01-10
Yep there is... It won't wrk at all...=/ As soon as you reboot after installing drivers to it it will crash. Atleast for me. I have reinstalled 5 times. And tried loads of diffrent drivers... Betas, latest, certified, older... You name it... All with the same prob. And MAtrox won't do whit they say. Not until it's out on the shells... Damn loosers!

data/avatar/default/avatar36.webp

1207 Posts
Location -
Joined 2000-03-27
Matrox released good stable beta drivers for the G400 under Win2000 about a month before Win2k was released to the public.
As ME isn't due for release until September 14th at the earliest, you can expect to wait at least another month before such drivers are available.
How many other companies have you seen releasing WinME drivers?
What makes Matrox loosers?
Just because Matrox are not releasing drivers yet for what still is a beta OS, that hardly makes them loosers.
Why don't you invest in a proper OS rather than waiting for an OS based on Windows code from 1995 which in turn is still based on old DOS routines?
Quit ya bashing, at least Matrox have stable drivers under Win2k, something a lot of video card manufacturers simply can't do.