NT4 w2k comparison

This is a discussion about NT4 w2k comparison in the Windows Hardware category; After upgrading (caugh) to w2k from NT4 sp6 I ran a couple of bench marks. I have not changed any of the settings, disks are set to dma all round. The hardware setup did not change. everything got slower (especially the disk mark nearly 50% slower) have a look at the clibench comparison below.

Windows Hardware 9627 This topic was started by , . Last reply by ,


data/avatar/default/avatar03.webp

28 Posts
Location -
Joined 2000-03-12
After upgrading (caugh) to w2k from NT4 sp6 I ran a couple of bench marks.
 
I have not changed any of the settings, disks are set to dma all round. The hardware setup did not change.
 
everything got slower (especially the disk mark nearly 50% slower) have a look at the clibench comparison below.
 
this other relative
computer computer performance
 
Dhrystone 2.1 Performance 1088 1157 MIPS 94 percent
Whetstone Performance 312 344 MFLOPS 90 percent
Eight queens problem 1536 1654 pps 92 percent
Matrix operations 24780 32379 k ops 76 percent
Number crunch performance 33412 35651 k ops 93 percent
Floating point performance 5213 5562 k ops 93 percent
Memory throughput 146726 143872 kB/sec 101 percent
Total 91 percent
 
Drive C Drive C
Read max 11302 18285 kB/sec
Read average 10923 17624 kB/sec
Read min 9360 17066 kB/sec
Write max 12610 21244 kB/sec
Write average 10673 20537 kB/sec
Write min 9110 20398 kB/sec
CPU usage 0 5 percent
 
Anyone have any idea why?

Participate in our website and join the conversation

You already have an account on our website? To log in, use the link provided below.
Login
Create a new user account. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds.
Register
This subject has been archived. New comments and votes cannot be submitted.
Jun 16
Created
Jun 16
Last Response
0
Likes
1 minute
Read Time
User User
Users

Responses to this topic


data/avatar/default/avatar18.webp

79 Posts
Location -
Joined 2001-01-01
Did you 'upgrade' from NT4 and install win2k over it or did you do a fresh install? I've heard win2k takes a performance hit aswell as other bad things when being upgraded from anything - a fresh install is allways best.