which soundcard

This is a discussion about which soundcard in the Windows Hardware category; I have the option of either a AWE64v or a SBPCI 128 obviously the 128 is based on newer technology but the midi synth output seems to be poor. can anybody shed any light?.

Windows Hardware 9627 This topic was started by , . Last reply by ,


data/avatar/default/avatar22.webp

47 Posts
Location -
Joined 2000-02-16
I have the option of either a AWE64v or a SBPCI 128
obviously the 128 is based on newer technology but the midi synth output seems to be poor. can anybody shed any light?

Participate in our website and join the conversation

You already have an account on our website? To log in, use the link provided below.
Login
Create a new user account. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds.
Register
This subject has been archived. New comments and votes cannot be submitted.
Oct 15
Created
Oct 17
Last Response
0
Likes
3 minutes
Read Time
User User User User User
Users

Responses to this topic


data/avatar/default/avatar32.webp

36 Posts
Location -
Joined 2000-01-12
I know nothing about the PCI128, but the AWE64 Value (from experience) works well over all. There are a few catches though. Your stuck with the default win2k drivers, and somethings don't work 100% all the time. I had a lot of trouble with the MIC IN, but a format seems to have strangely fixed that problem.

data/avatar/default/avatar03.webp

90 Posts
Location -
Joined 2000-07-11
I'll put my experience. I had a sb32pnp, and bought a pci 128.
You'll have to find what drivers u need (there are currently 4 or 5 types of sound cards that are named PCI 128, depending on the number following the CT characters.....
and in the end, it wasn't compatible with my mobo, so i returned to sb32pnp.
AnyWay my model was a CT 4810, and after 2 days of research I found it uses the drivers of a ES 1371 (Ensoniq!!!), a firm that creative bought long ago.
go on with awe64, my opinion.

data/avatar/default/avatar18.webp

397 Posts
Location -
Joined 1999-08-31
My SB64 also with es1371 has far better drivers than my SBlive. Fair enough it doesn't have 3d sound or eax etc, but at least it gives faultless performance. It is excellent for mixing MP3's in winamp. Compare:
 
Winamp, using Directsound output:
 
ES1371
 
Bufferlength >> 100ms
Blocksize >> 1K
Can mix 5 mp3 at same time before breaking up (on k6-2 550)
 
SBlive
 
Bufferlength >> 400ms (yet still loses sync)
Blocksize >> 10k
 
The card refuses to play 2 tracks at the same time, instead creative have invented an amazing form of TDM (time division multiplexing) good for telecommunication companies, but not mixing tunes.
 
Therefore the sb64pci is at least 4 times faster, and is very stable. Basically when you go to match up BPMs or change the pitch the ensoiq chip is far far faster. It is impossible to mix with close to a half second delay. This also is reflected in audio apps. such as VST, and wavelab...
 
I worship the ES1371.
 
 
------------------
System Spec:
Athlon 800
Gigabyte GA-7IXE F4
128Mb SSi PC100
Radeon 64Mb DDR (10/10)
Hauppauge Wintv Model 406
Realtek 8029 LAN (cnx to ISDN server)
Creative ES1371 PCI64v
Creative SBlive Value
Creative 48mx CDROM
Memorex TriMaxx200(DVD/CDR/CDRW, 6,4,24)
Maxtor 91301U3 13Gb UDMA 4
LS120
 
If Jungle.com say it is not in stock it'll never be in stock, so don't order it.

data/avatar/default/avatar22.webp

47 Posts
Location -
Joined 2000-02-16
OP
euan..........my cards are SB AWE64V and an SB PCI128
do your comments apply to these cards
are you saying I should stick with the PCI card as opposed to the older ISA AWE64??

data/avatar/default/avatar18.webp

397 Posts
Location -
Joined 1999-08-31
SB64 and sb128 are pretty much the same, except the 128 has an extra 64 software midi voices. I would go with the PCI128.

data/avatar/default/avatar40.webp

169 Posts
Location -
Joined 2000-04-04
I'm currently using a SB128 (1373 - also Ensoniq ) without even a hickup. After a hard search for 1373 drivers, they eventually turned up at Intel's website. Creative's been giving them certified drivers since Feb 2000, but haven't given the public any drivers (damn Creative support!).
Since I started using those drivers though it's worked flawlessly. I agree with euankirkhope in that I like the card much better than the Live! card I used to own. I have no problems and it's mixer definately performs a lot better.