Win2k + CUSL2 performance
This is a discussion about Win2k + CUSL2 performance in the Windows Hardware category; I am getting REALLY bad disk performance with this setup in Win2k. My HDD is constantly getting thrashed, and everything is much more sluggish than expected. Anybody got this working on a decent performance level?.
I am getting REALLY bad disk performance with this setup in Win2k. My HDD is constantly getting thrashed, and everything is much more sluggish than expected. Anybody got this working on a decent performance level?
------------------
------------------
Participate in our website and join the conversation
This subject has been archived. New comments and votes cannot be submitted.
Jan 30
Feb 2
0
2 minutes
Responses to this topic

OP
Sys specs below. I should be running it quite smoothly, don't you agree?
BTW, my Sandra HDD scores are like 10000 now, in Win98se they are over 24,000.
------------------
PIII 700e @ 1021mhz
Asus CUSL2
256MB PC133
IBM 75GXP 30.0GB ATA100/7200RPM
Geforce 2 GTS Pro
BTW, my Sandra HDD scores are like 10000 now, in Win98se they are over 24,000.
------------------
PIII 700e @ 1021mhz
Asus CUSL2
256MB PC133
IBM 75GXP 30.0GB ATA100/7200RPM
Geforce 2 GTS Pro
I believe you have to manually enable ATA 66 in Win2K. Some registry setting, i dont remember which. ATA 100 support is coming in SP2 I believe.

OP
Yes, I've tried that, as well as using some of the tweak guides from various websites, all to no avail. Seems strange to me because I used to have Win2k running on a 5400rpm Maxtor drive awhile back (albeit not on this system) and it ran extremely smooth.
------------------
PIII 700e @ 1021mhz
Asus CUSL2
256MB PC133
IBM 75GXP 30.0GB ATA100/7200RPM
Geforce 2 GTS Pro
------------------
PIII 700e @ 1021mhz
Asus CUSL2
256MB PC133
IBM 75GXP 30.0GB ATA100/7200RPM
Geforce 2 GTS Pro
My CUSL-2 has just been sent back for repair
Once I get it back I will run some tests again and see the benchmark scores, however I must admit I had never noticed any bad performance with this board.
Once I get it back I will run some tests again and see the benchmark scores, however I must admit I had never noticed any bad performance with this board.
whats the pagefile min/max set to?
make sure they are both set to the same setting. changing pagefile size on the fly is horridly slow. u have the same system memory i do so u can set your pagefile to cache only when nessesary
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Session Manager\Memory Management
and set this dword to
DisablePagingExecutive 1
war
make sure they are both set to the same setting. changing pagefile size on the fly is horridly slow. u have the same system memory i do so u can set your pagefile to cache only when nessesary
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Session Manager\Memory Management
and set this dword to
DisablePagingExecutive 1
war
Try a standard ata 33 ide cable instaed of the ata 100 ide cable, since win2k doesnt support ata 100 until sp2. Or call microsoft to get the pre-sp2 hotfix for ata100 support

OP
Any other ideas? I'm sure there are a lot of people running this combo.
------------------
PIII 700e @ 1021mhz
Asus CUSL2
256MB PC133
IBM 75GXP 30.0GB ATA100/7200RPM
Geforce 2 GTS Pro
------------------
PIII 700e @ 1021mhz
Asus CUSL2
256MB PC133
IBM 75GXP 30.0GB ATA100/7200RPM
Geforce 2 GTS Pro
OK, dumb question. Are you running Win2K Pro, Server, or Adv. Server? Also, "findfast" isn't running by chance is it?
------------------
Regards,
clutch
------------------
Regards,
clutch

OP
It's Win2k pro, and no, findfast is not running.