WinME survey: PLEASE READ

This is a discussion about WinME survey: PLEASE READ in the Windows Software category; Ok I am wondering what types of experiences you guys are having, and also what chipsets are working best with WinME. Is BX still the top dog? Or has VIA gotten better? Please let us know here. Thx.

Windows Software 5498 This topic was started by , . Last reply by ,


data/avatar/default/avatar35.webp

1030 Posts
Location -
Joined 2000-02-19
Ok I am wondering what types of experiences you guys are having, and also what chipsets are working best with WinME. Is BX still the top dog? Or has VIA gotten better? Please let us know here. Thx

Participate in our website and join the conversation

You already have an account on our website? To log in, use the link provided below.
Login
Create a new user account. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds.
Register
This subject has been archived. New comments and votes cannot be submitted.
Jul 6
Created
Jul 15
Last Response
0
Likes
3 minutes
Read Time
User User User User User User
Users

Responses to this topic


data/avatar/default/avatar36.webp

1207 Posts
Location -
Joined 2000-03-27
Ummmmm,
Call me Mr. Picky, but isn't this forum for aplications and their use under WinNT & Win2000 and not for some revised revision of a 1995 OS?
 
------------------
 
PIII 650 Coppermine, ABit BE6-II, 384MB PC100 RAM (Samsung), Matrox G400MAX, SB Live! Value, Intel 10/100 NIC, Adaptec 2940UW, IBM 7200 ATA66 22GB HD, IBM 7200 ATA66 20GB HD, Pioneer 32x/6x SCSI DVD, Yamaha 4416 SCSI CD-RW, Iomega Zip 100 SCSI Internal, Iiyama Vision Master Pro 410.

data/avatar/default/avatar35.webp

1030 Posts
Location -
Joined 2000-02-19
OP
Well I know of no WinME forum anywhere and I have seen WinME discussed on this forum before, so it is fair game I believe.

data/avatar/default/avatar13.webp

193 Posts
Location -
Joined 2000-05-25
I think your request was reasonable. Many NT(w2k) users are using a dual boot system so the question pr-man asks is relevant.
I'd say via is still miles from being anywhere close to king. I owned a gigabyte GA-6VX7 mobo that used the apollo pro chipset (socket 370) and had zillions of probs. Random reboots, complete freezes (every 3 hours or so) games freezing, etc.. Tried all the via 4-1 drivers. Useless. Bios upgrades, drivers.. nothing would work. In the end, went back to BX. Not one hardware crash. VIA chipsets remain dodgy to say the least.

data/avatar/default/avatar16.webp

1615 Posts
Location -
Joined 2000-03-25
win ME is great! fast, stable, reliable, compatible. (and i am still running build 2491 might i add)
 
------------------
My System
Dell Demension XPS T500
Dual Boot Windows 2000 Pro / Windows ME Beta 3
PIII @ 500 Mhz (with after market heatsink and dual fan)
128 Megs PC133 Ram
TNT2 Ultra Graphics Card (with the core and memory overclocked by 20 Mhz and dual voodoo coolers)
3Com 10/100 Ethernet Card
3Com 56k Modem
12.6 Gig IBM HD
40X CD Rom Drive
100 Mb Zip Drive

data/avatar/default/avatar03.webp

90 Posts
Location -
Joined 2000-07-11
My experience with winME is rather strange, anyway I've managed it and now I'm satisfied....
Only problems where:
-Drivespace 3 doesn't support hard drives anymore;had to reinstall 98, copy all compressed data on an uncompressed drive and reinstall WinME.
-Office 2000 Pro first CD gives an error during the second part of install.Installing second CD (Publisher 2000) makes everything allright.

data/avatar/default/avatar04.webp

66 Posts
Location -
Joined 2000-05-13
SOYO 6VBA dual boot Win2k pro and Willenium.
A few games refuse to work right on ME.
Work better in Win2k.
It's not a problem with the chipset VIA.
It's the game who dares to be called OS WinME.
It's fast as heck.