What should I do about "Generic Process for Win32 Services"?

Can somebody throw some light on Generic Process for Win32 Services, which pops up as a permittable process with Internet access in software firewalls. I'm currently contemplating switching from Norton Internet Security to Zone Alarm and I had desperate problems with that process in the Norton product.

Windows Security 292 This topic was started by ,



data/avatar/default/avatar24.webp

418 Posts
Location -
Joined 2002-03-25
Can somebody throw some light on "Generic Process for Win32 Services", which pops up as a permittable process with Internet access in software firewalls. I'm currently contemplating switching from Norton Internet Security to Zone Alarm and I had desperate problems with that process in the Norton product.
 
The default settings in the firewall for "Generic Process ....." are usually 'all channels permitted' but, certainly in Win2K, as soon as you then try to access the Internet, an "svchost.exe" error is generated and reported onscreen. The program is then terminated. If you manually configure the process to be non-permitted and you then access the Internet, a number of viruses are let in (usually Trojans). Blocking the process also seems to affect the downloading of files from certain websites.
 
This was a major problem in Norton and could be solved only by complete non-permitting of the process from the very start. If once the svchost error is flagged, you've little option but to re-format.
 
Does anyone have any experience of this, especially with Zone Alarm, and can suggest a way of avoiding the problem whilst still allowing standard Internet access? Is this a problem that's unique to Win2K, or just unique to the Norton firewall?

Participate on our website and join the conversation

You have already an account on our website? Use the link below to login.
Login
Create a new user account. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds.
Register
This topic is archived. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast.

Responses to this topic